admin
the dimensions of that tuna !!
W
When I was a kid. I thought tuna was a small fish. My reasoning for this was because when you went to the store, they were sold in small cans. 🤣
R
Thats a fucking Threena
R
Chali 3na
M
The friendly neighborhood baritone? The verbal Herman Munster?
S
The word enhancer. Sick of phony mobsters controlling the dance floor.
B
Intelligent rap act or militant black cat… Killin’ venomous platinum plaque macks By forever spittin’ relevant facts and that’s that
G
Blew my mind when I found out how big tuna fish are
H
Close to a Fourna
R
‘Gonna need a bigger boat’
R
It’s one big fournacation
Y
Not AI slop. Just a blurry video from four years ago. [https://www.reddit.com/r/AbsoluteUnits/comments/vuncez/this\_huge\_643lbs\_29166\_kilo\_bluefin\_tuna\_caught/](https://www.reddit.com/r/AbsoluteUnits/comments/vuncez/this_huge_643lbs_29166_kilo_bluefin_tuna_caught/)
S
Thanks for posting this. I hate that people think everything is AI these days.
F
It’s genuinely getting harder to tell, And I hate that it is happening.
F
Internet is dying unfortunately
C
Are we nearing the Cyberpunk Blackwall?
H
Wake me up when I can blackwall quickhack random people for fun.
F
Snowcrash!
C
Good. Doesn’t deserve to live in it’s current form
S
Don’t blame the internet, blame the users
Z
>Don’t blame the internet, blame the users Blame the corporations that ruined it
T
Society is devolving at a governmental level.
N
The Internet sucks these days compared to the 2000s.
E
My parents recently reminded me of the time I emphatically assured them that they cannot trust **anything** they see on a digital display, even if they agree with it. Your phone is for AI slop and your favorite “news” channel is for human slop. All channels of communication strongly seek to leverage confirmation bias to further their own agendas. Not everything (like this post) is fictional, but so much of what comes to us from a screen is fiction masquerading as fact, we should just treat everything from any device as unreal. The problem has only gotten worse with each passing year, so we (all of us) need to stop letting screens define reality for us. Zero trust is the only sane approach left for anybody who has any hope of thinking for themselves.
A
I’ve been thinking about this lately. Imagine someone who was born between now and about 5 years ago. They will never know if anything they read or see is actually real… That isn’t going to be good. Zero trust as you say is the logical way to go but I think it will be too exhausting for most people. They will just choose a group to listen too and that will be their reality. I think it should be a law that any AI altered photo or video needs to be marked in some way and it should be illegal to use someones likeness in an AI video without their consent.
S
> I think it should be a law that any AI altered photo or video needs to be marked in some way Unfortunately we’re way past that. I mess around with Stable Diffusion (image generation) and on 10 year old consumer hardware I can take your face and paste it into a video of any kind (pick your poison). It’s all open source, there’s no one to hold accountable (except me and the laws where I live if I were to ever distribute it and someone thought to report it). Not only is there no way to ‘mark’ it as AI, there’s no way to know what AI was used to create it. Maybe the big players in the US might be regulated into doing this, but all it takes is a small team in China, India, or South Sudan with enough GPUs to distribute software that can put your likeness into any situation that you find disturbing without leaving a trace.
H
While I agree that we need to figure out some method of marking generated stuff the problem is that pretty much everything that’s been tried so far is beyond trivial to pass for any even remotely motivated bad actor. And that’s just really zero trust with extra steps.
D
There are practical limits to this though. I guess I could read a physical newspaper, but it’s subject to the same subjective truths as an online article. I’m not going to Washington DC to see press conferences in person. If I want to be connected to the world at all, I need some kind of feedback from a screen. The trick is figuring out where to draw the line.
R
I can’t go on the rest of my life asking “Is it AI?” Glad half my personality is science and education but it makes the Internet significantly less interesting if I have to ask that question more and more.
J
I think audio is still the last big tell. Ai hasn’t nailed down audio yet and if it’s AI the sound sounds like it’s in the wrong spot compared to the subject.
L
Depends on your musical ability. I am totally a-musical. A musical illiterate essentially. Cant keep rhythm, I dont hear the difference between expensive high class speakers and a 20 euro bluetooth speakers, If you ask me if I know famous song X by artist Y I cant answer until I hear it because I dont remember song names, etc etc etc. I am totally 100% fooled by AI music. I cannot hear the difference between a human strumming some riffs for funsies and an AI pretending to do that. Until a friend pointed out I was listening to an AI guitar solo I was subscribed to a youtube channel that only has AI music. I’m a visual artist and a coder, a technical artist. I easily spot AI images and code. I have to assume that people who dont do graphics for a living have as hard a time recognizing AI images as I have recognizing AI music.
R
I hate to tell you but gen AI video can now do realistic audio that is synced to the video, as of maybe 3-4 months ago
C
I dunno… when I see/hear things [like this](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Sb1Nvi7oQs) I’m reminded what Orwell wrote: > “The tune had been haunting London for weeks past. It was one of countless similar songs published for the benefit of the proles by a sub-section of the Music Department. The words of these songs were composed without any human intervention whatever on an instrument known as a versificator. But the woman sang so tunefully as to turn the dreadful rubbish into an almost pleasant sound. He could hear the woman singing and the scrape of her shoes on the flagstones, and the cries of the children in the street, and somewhere in the distance, a faint roar of traffic, and yet the room seemed curiously silent, thanks to the absence of a telescreen.”
L
It doesnt help that many people just say it to say it and don’t care if it’s true
B
Every time I can correctly spot AI I’m reminded of the image of the “Survivorship bias” aircraft with the red dots and feel even more upset.
L
It’s because a lot of things are ai these days, like it literally gets worse each week. And you can’t tell sometimes
B
I expect AI to start making potato quality soon. For the clicks.
A
Dont they already do this with these Ringcam Style videos of animals doing weird shit?
L
I hate AI videos even more than people who think everything is AI. AI videos are reason for that, not the people.
T
To be fair most of it is.
T
“This is the hell we’re living in”
J
I hate the internet now. My first thought was – I have no reason to suspect this so AI but I can’t be certain.
E
Because most of the things are. Especially animal videos.
C
Me not. I appreciate people are cautions.
M
Cautious is asking if something might be AI and learning how to spot it or learning more about the amazing things possible in the real world. Cautious is not confidently saying “fake and AI” to everything with absolutely no knowledge of either the real world OR AI image creation. Actively choosing to understand less about the world from both ends. I’ve only ever seen the second one, personally.
C
>learning how to spot it or learning more about the amazing things possible in the real world. I was just thinking this before scrolling down to this comment. Having a good education helps you cross reference what you know with what you’re seeing. And helps you determine if it could even be real in the first place. And even if it’s fake, that doesn’t necessarily mean AI. It could be CGI.
W
I’ve seen so many comments confidently cite reasons something is AI that just shows their scrutiny over AI is making them lose touch with what real videos actually look like. Like claiming a blurring effect that happens with low FPS motion is AI slopping up details, or not perceiving depth and calling out one feature for “clipping” through another when it’s really just one in front of the other.
A
They’re not though. If they were cautious, you’d be seeing AI skepticism on news videos and articles. They only care to make a fuss over the jokes and pranks. In the important areas, everything is still swallowed wholesale and we go straight to arguing or forming a mob.
–
Accusations ≠ caution
A
Okay, that was the wrong word. Fair. How about skepticism
G
I hate that a lot of times they’re right. (Not this vid though, it’s been around for quite a while, and that chick is totally badass)
GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings